A line item you can add to the SEO you already sell.
Seenvia works alongside the SEO you do for your clients, not instead of it. It measures the one thing Search Console cannot see — whether AI assistants name your client when someone asks for a local recommendation — and turns the gaps into fixes you can hand to your own team.
The free check needs no account and no card, so you can run one on a prospect the night before the meeting. It asks Perplexity only; the paid plans ask ChatGPT and Gemini too.
Shipped, and working today.
Three assistants, every week
We ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini the questions your client’s customers actually ask — “best dentist in Ballantyne”, not brand-name searches — and record who got named. Weekly, so you can show a trend rather than a snapshot.
Who gets named instead
Name a client’s local competitors and we track how often AI mentions them versus your client.
Findings arrive as prepared work
The audit covers the site, the listings and name-address-phone consistency, and each finding comes with the fix already made up — a corrected file, a snippet with paste-here instructions, a pre-filled directory form. Your team applies it.
Nothing goes out as your client
No passwords, no posting on their behalf. Anything touching reputation — a review reply, a forum answer — is drafted for a human to send under their own name. If you are the one holding the client relationship, that matters more to you than it does to them.
A weekly email written to be forwarded
Each account gets a plain-English summary of what moved and why, written so a client can read it without a dashboard login or a translation layer. Forward it, or lift the numbers into your own report.
Multi-location clients
A client with several offices is tracked per location, not averaged into one number — up to 10 locations on Grow. Each location gets its own queries, its own audit and its own fixes.
We scanned 399 local businesses and published what we found.
Method, sample sizes and the raw counts are all in the piece, including the findings that argue against things we sell.
of the sources Perplexity cited for local recommendations were something other than a business’s own website — directories, roundup lists, a few Reddit threads. On-site work alone does not reach that half of the citations.
from structured data on whether a business got cited, across 399 sites. Review volume did predict it. We sell schema generation and we still publish this, because an agency can check it.
overlap between the sources ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini used for the same question — far below what the same engine does with itself. One assistant is not a proxy for the other two.
Try it on one of your clients.
Tell us which clients you’d run it for and what you’d want to show them. You’ll hear back from the person building it.